Legal Opinion

DiFrancesco v. Particle Interconnect Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2001No. 00CA0601PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Defendant, Louis DiFrancesco, d/b/a Particle Interconnect Research and Development, Inc., appeals from the judgment enforcing a settlement of his patent dispute with Particle Interconnect Corporation (PIC), Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. (NTT), Intercell Corporation, and Paul Metzinger (collectively, plaintiffs). We reverse and remand.

This lawsuit concerns technology patented by defendant. In 1996, defendant merged his wholly-owned company with PIC, assigned his patents to the latter entity, and entered into a one-year consulting agreement. NTI is the successor in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 v. KelseySupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Stice v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Shoels v. KleboldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Hoang v. ArbessColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Jorgensen v. Colorado Rural Properties, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Uhlmann v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API