Legal Opinion

Burns v. Wannamaker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1984No. 0155PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge.

This appeal concerns an express pretreatment warranty allegedly given by a dentist. We affirm the Circuit Court to the extent that it found that an express pretreatment war ranty to effect a particular result can be extended in South Carolina by a dentist; however, we reverse the Circuit Court’s conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to support the magistrate’s finding of fact that the appellant Robert L. Wannamaker, a dentist, gave and breached an express warranty as to the manufacture and fit of dentures purchased from him by the respondent Mary Sue Burns and we remand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Sullivan v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Preston v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Guilmet v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Harvey v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Hadfield v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API