Legal Opinion

Guilmet v. Campbell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1971No. 2 April Term 1970, Docket No. 52,412. No. 9, January Term 1971, Docket No. 52,412PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

This appeal presents a very-simple question but it is fraught with great danger to the public weal.

The question is: Was the trial court in error in refusing to grant defendant’s motion for a Judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the plaintiffs ?

The defendants are skilled surgeons who performed a relatively complicated operation on plaintiff Richard Guilmet, and after such operation the plaintiffs suffered very great damages.

The danger attendant upon decision here is that on one hand if we sanction the award of damages to the plaintiffs we may foster suits which threaten the freedom…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gault v. SidemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. McKenzie v. SykesMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Beebe v. KoshnicMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Strong v. SaundersMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Sullivan v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Perin v. HayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Karen Stephenson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Dingle v. BelinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API