Legal Opinion
Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. Hitchcock
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 29, 1998No. 2860PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Foreign plaintiffs George Hart and Ann Law brought this action against their attorneys for failing to procure appropriate visas, licenses, and permits to enable their business, Holy Loch Distributors, Inc., to lawfully sell beer in South Carolina. Defendants moved for dismissal of the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP for failure to state a cause of action. The trial court dismissed the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand. 1
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1991, appellants George Hart and Ann Law, who are both citizens of the United…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Snell v. Columbia Gun Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Dillon County School District Number Two v. Lewis Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Kleckley v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Williams v. CondonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Washington v. Lexington County JailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.