Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 6, 1985No. 0533PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This is an action for breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Pumroy Rutledge in the amount of $7,460.23 actual damages and $35,000.00 punitive damages. The trial judge awarded Rutledge attorney fees and prejudgment interest. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF & G) appeal. We reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

The issues on appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to support an award of punitive damages, the admissibility of certain…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. StanislawskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Verrastro v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Edens v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Grover E. Rabon, Jr. v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company, Grover E. Rabon, Jr. v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. Pacheco v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API