Legal Opinion
Hadfield v. Gilchrist
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 2, 2000No. 3246PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Mark Hadfield filed this action against Sam Gilchrist, d/b/a Gilchrist’s Service Center, and d/b/a Gilchrist Towing Company (Gilchrist) for damages sustained by Hadfield’s vehicle while impounded on Gilchrist’s lot. The magistrate awarded Hadfield $4,035.00. The Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the magistrate. Gilchrist appeals. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Gilchrist owns a motor vehicle towing service and maintains .a storage facility for the retention of the towed vehicles. Gilchrist operates under a license issued by the City of Charleston.
Hadfield, a medical…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- United States v. Alcaraz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Fleischman, Morris & Co. v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- American Ambassador Casualty Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trivelas v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Bank of New York v. Sumter CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Becker v. Pacific Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Parks v. Characters Night ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Daisy Outdoor Advertising Co. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.