Selkirk v. Winfield
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton; Moinet (Edward J.), J. Assumpsit by Ralph W. Selkirk against William H. Winfield for the price of certain cows. - Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff is a resident of Montana. He sold to defendant, a resident of Clinton county, Michigan, 50 head of cows at $75 per head, f. o. b. Columbus, Montana. The plaintiff sued defendant and recovered a judgment. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The case calls for the construction of a letter and a telegram. The letter reads:
*206“Heart Bar L Ranch,
Fishtail, Montana,
January 1, 1920.
“Mr. W. H. Winfield,
“Shepardsville, Mich.
_ “Dear Mr. Winfield: The cows which we advertised are high-grade, four-year-old, dehorned Herefords, bred to registered bulls for spring calves. Due to a bad summer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKenzie v. SykesMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Cutler v. SpensMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Wagner v. EglestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.