Legal Opinion
Cutler v. Spens
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Wayne; Lamb, J., presiding. Assumpsit on the common counts by Wallie Cutler and another against John Spens. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This is an action in assumpsit; the declaration being upon the common counts to which were attached two contracts. The contracts in the order of their dates are as follows:
Exhibit C.
“This agreement made this 15th day of October, A. D. 1913, by and between John Spens, of Halfway, Michigan, party of the first part, and Wallie Cutler and Selma Cutler, his wife, of Detroit^ Michigan, parties of the second part, witnesseth: The said party of the first part covenants and agrees to and with the parties of the second part that he has on this day bargained and sold unto Wallie Cutler, and Selma…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Thomson Electric Welding Co. v. Peerless Wire Fence Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Mowrey v. VandlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Brittson v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Joseph v. RottschaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Thompson v. JostNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.