Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Egleston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This case was once before in this Court, and the decision upon it is reported in 46 Mich. 610. It has. been retried, and has resulted in verdict and judgment for the defendant, under rulings by the circuit judge in supposed accordance with our decision. The plaintiff brings the case here again, and contends that the facts, as they appeared on the second trial, were so far different from *220those shown on the first, as to make substantially a new and different case, and render our former decision inapplicable. But he contends further, as we understand him, that even on the facts as they before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Quinnin v. ReimersMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nag Enterprises, Inc v. All State Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Jerry Sawyer, Trustee of Leon Spinks v. Bob Arum, Top Rank, Inc., and Bob Arum Enterprises, Inc., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Muir v. Leonard Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Siporin v. AdlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API