McKenzie v. Sykes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. Replevin. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is an action of replevin for a quantity of wheat which was raised by Sykes on the land of McKenzie, who is his father-in-law, while the parties were living-together upon it. The chief controversy concerns the bargain under which the wheat was raised.
Roth of the parties, and also their wives, were sworn and' examined as witnesses. The testimony of Sykes tended to show that after his marriage with McKenzie’s daughter in September, 1878, it was talked over between himself and McKenzie that he should live in the house with McKenzie, work the farm and raise what he could off it, let McKenzie…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Strong v. SaundersMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Maas v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Engle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- In re the Estate of YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Kingsley Associates, Inc., Cross-Appellee. v. Del-Met, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Guilmet v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Becker v. HolmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Innotext Incorporated v. Petra'Lex USA IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.