Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Stoeckel

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff is seeking to foreclose two* mortgages executed by the Gaynor Manufacturing Company. One of the two* principal issues has to do with the question of priority between the second of these mortgages and a certain judgment lien filed by the defendant The Remington Arms Union Metallic Cartridge Company, upon the same property described in the mortgage. The court (Avery, J.), on demurrer to the answer of the Arms Company, held that the* judgment lien had precedence, and from that decision the plaintiff has appealed. The* facts are simple: On October 27th, 1917, the Arms Company began…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. Merrills v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  4. Coughlin v. McElroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. Central Railway & Electric Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Union Trust Co. v. HeggelundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Second National Bank of New Haven v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Iamartino v. AvalloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Bradford Realty Corporation v. BeetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API