Moran v. Morneau
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The dispositive issue in this foreclosure, action is whether a default judgment entered against the defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC (Chase),1 definitively established the hen priority order alleged in *222the amended complaint2 of the plaintiff, Michel Moran. Because we hold that the factual allegations in the complaint, even if true, did not, as a matter of law, establish that the plaintiff held the first priority, Chase’s default did not operate to reify the plaintiffs erroneous legal conclusions. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts and procedural…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ratner v. WillametzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Commissioner of Social Services v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. GarofaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Mountview Plaza Associates Inc. v. World Wide Pet Supply, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perez v. CarlevaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015