Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Ramos
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 7, 1982PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.
The issues presented by this appeal from the judgment rendered in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding address the propriety of the trial court’s rulings concerning (1) the rate of interest to be applied on the note subsequent to its maturity date; (2) the granting of certain credits, which were applied to reduce the face amount of the note; and (3) the date that these credits became applicable as offsets to the debt.
From the evidence presented at trial, the court could reasonably and logically have found the following facts: On December 14, 1973, the defendant Edmund Ramos, then the owner of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Southbridge Associates, LLC v. GarofaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Gulack v. GulackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.