Legal Opinion
State v. Scheineman
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 12, 2002No. 1196-01PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
Appellee was indicted for attempted burglary of a habitation with intent to commit theft. The trial court granted ap-pellee’s motion to suppress his statement given while in custody. The state appealed that decision. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s suppression order. State v. Scheineman, 47 S.W.3d 754 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, pet. granted). We granted the State Prosecuting Attorney’s petition for discretionary review which challenged the court of appeals’ decision. We will…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. Scheineman, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
4Cited by41 opinions
- Banargent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- In re H.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Moseley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Cortez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.