Legal Opinion

Cortez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 21, 2007No. 03-06-00359-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

A jury found appellant Manuel Cortez guilty of murder and assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02 (West 2008). In four points of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred by admitting in evidence statements he made to police officers and his mother that he argues were unlawfully obtained. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

In our review of the trial court’s rulings admitting the challenged statements, we defer to the court’s findings of fact but review de novo…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OdgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. Stephen Vinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  3. Stephen Vinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  4. in the Matter of C.M., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API