Legal Opinion

In re H.V.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2008No. 06-0005PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Justice O’NEILL, Justice MEDINA, Justice JOHNSON, and Justice WILLETT joined.

This is the first appeal under a 2003 statute allowing appellate review of certain orders suppressing evidence in juvenile justice eases.1 Because the statute contains no express grant of jurisdiction to this Court, we may review such interlocutory orders only if they fall within our general jurisdictional statutes, which were • also amended in 2003. Finding that we have such jurisdiction, we affirm the court of appeals’ opinion in part and reverse in part.

I. Background

Evidence presented at the suppression…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Rosscer Craig Tucker, Ii v. Lizabeth ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re J.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. State v. Sendra BeauregardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  5. 21SA386- People v. Trujillo-Tucson Orals not heldSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API