Page v. Sloan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant insists that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable in this case and, being entitled under that doctrine to have the case submitted to the jury, that summary judgment for defendant was error. We agree.
Summary judgment is proper only where movant shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur recognizes that common experience sometimes permits a reasonable inference of negligence from the occurrence itself. In other words, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- O'QUINN v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Harris v. . MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Brown v. Kinston Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Deitz v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Sparks v. Oxy-Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.