Legal Opinion

Dacey v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 14, 1946No. Civil Action 4004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the petitioner under the reemployment provisions of Section 8 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 308. Petitioner seeks reinstatement to his former position as Chief of Police at the Quincy, Massachusetts, Yard of the respondent company, together with accrued wages from the date of the alleged refusal to reemploy him.

Findings of Fact

Petitioner, a resident of Quincy, Massachusetts, entered the employ of the respondent company at its Fore River Shipbuilding Yard in Quincy on September 16,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  3. Kay v. General Cable CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
  4. Anderson v. SchouweilerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1945
  5. Grasso v. CrowhurstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Van Doren v. Van Doren Laundry Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Thompson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1948
  4. McClayton v. W. B. Cassell Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1946
  5. Harrison G. Travis v. Schwartz Manufacturing Co., a Corp., Harrison G. Travis v. Schwartz Manufacturing Co., a Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API