Legal Opinion

Grasso v. Crowhurst

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 26, 1946No. 8966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was discharged from the United States Army on October 5, 1943. At the time he entered military service and for the seven or eight years immediately prior thereto, he had been employed as a tacker in appellees’ leather factory. On October 25th or 29th, 1943 he called at the factory and talked with Charles M. Crowhurst, one of the appellees. It is . undisputed that he asked the latter for a leave of absence. The District Court finding that Grasso desired an indefinite leave of absence is correct as far as it goes. Crowhurst testified that Grasso told him he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. In re the Will of WalkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  3. Grasso v. CrowhurstDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Dacey v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
  3. Bozar v. Central Pennsylvania Quarry, Stripping & Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Cummings v. HubbellDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Parliman v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API