Legal Opinion
Van Doren v. Van Doren Laundry Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 1947No. 9279, 9291PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Circuit Judge.
The cross-appeals in this case raise questions concerning the reemployment provisions of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 308. Petitioner has sought (a) reinstatement to the positions of office mauager and purchasing agent of respondent, and (b) payment of compensation for the period during which he was denied such restoration. In the court below, the chief grounds of defense asserted by respondent were based upon petitioner’s physical condition and a change of circumstances alleged to render “unreasonable” the reemployment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Boston & M. R. R. v. BentuboCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Kay v. General Cable CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Dacey v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
- Karas v. KleinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael Churma v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Levine v. Berman (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Bochterle v. Albert Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Timothy O'mara, Cross-Appellee v. Petersen Sand & Gravel Company, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Karl Green v. Tho-Ro Products, Inc., a Corporation of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.