Legal Opinion

Kay v. General Cable Corporation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1945No. Misc. 778aPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This matter is before me on an application by the defendant for an order vacating an ex-parte order previously entered and for entry of a new order.

This proceeding was initially brought under the■ Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 308, which provides under section 308(b) (3) (B), that any person who upon entering the military or naval service of the United States, has left “a position, other than a temporary position, * * * in the employ of a private employer” shall, in the case of a private employer, be restored to such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kay v. General Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Brian S. Leib v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. John S. Doane Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  4. Van Doren v. Van Doren Laundry Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Thompson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API