Legal Opinion
Estate of Rule
California Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1944No. Sac. No. 5607PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 Cal.2d 1 (1944)
Estate of CHARLES HENRY STONE RULE, Deceased. ALEX McCLUSKEY, Respondent,
v.
WALLACE L. WARE et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants.
Sac. No. 5607.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Oct. 16, 1944.
Young, Hudson & Rabinowitz for Appellants.
Barrett & McConnell and A. Dal Thomson for Respondent.
Breed, Burpee & Robinson as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.
SCHAUER, J.
This is an appeal by the executors of the last will and testament of Charles H. S. Rule, deceased, from an order of the probate court fixing and allowing a broker's commission, and directing payment thereof by the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.