Mathews v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action is brought by H. O. Mathews and Mary H. Mathews, his wife, to quiet their title, to obtain a decree that a certain agreement is a cloud upon their title to a lot of land by them owned and possessed, situate and being in the city of Stockton, county of San Joaquin, and to cancel and annul such agreement.
Plaintiffs had a decree as prayed for, from which and from an order denying a motion for a new trial the defendant, Josephine Eltinge, appeals.
*204The facts as found by the court are not assailed for want of evidence in their support, by the brief of appellant.
They are too…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Leonis v. LazzarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Banbury v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flege v. GarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Carlton v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Fowler v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Becker v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.