Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1983No. Civ. 26293PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, J.
This action was instituted by Thomas W. Fowler, Donna M. Fowler, Janet P. Hall, Martin Kennedy and Sharon L. Kennedy, as sellers, against John M. Ross, as buyer, relative to an agreement to purchase certain real property on which the sellers had agreed to build a house according to specifications. The first amended and supplementary complaint sought rescission, a declaration of rights under the contract and damages for defamation which allegedly occurred during the dealings between the parties. The buyer answered and made a timely request for a jury trial but, before the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Caira v. OffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Henry v. SharmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Beverly Way Associates v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.