Legal Opinion

Morilla Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 27, 1951No. C. D. 1372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The-merchandise before the court in this case consists of handmade drawing paper. It was classified by the collector as handmade paper, and assessed with duty at the rate of 1%. cents, per pound and per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provision for such paper in paragraph 1407 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802. In protesting against the collector’s classification, plaintiff has claimed that the paper in question is drawing paper which, under the provisions of said paragraph 1407 (a), as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. American Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Electrolux Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  4. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API