United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8033 (T. D. 37032). [Oral argument Oct. 10,1917, by Mr. Baldwin and Mr. Brown.]
1Opinion of the Court
De Vries, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
The issues here presented for decision are twofold:(1) What constitutes "scalloped” as that word is used in paragraph 358, infra, of the tariff act of 1913 ?
*352In the view here taken,' that question is unnecessary of decision and not decided. The appeal is controlled and decided by the other issue presented.
The importations are of madras muslin curtains in the piece and otherwise and materials therefor, scalloped, and were classified for duty by the collector at the port of New York under that portion of paragraph 358 of said act, reading:
858.*…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.