Legal Opinion

American Trading Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 16, 1911No. 99PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 20115 (T. D. 29429).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case is concededly handmade paper weighing over 10 pounds to the ream. The appellant claims and the board found that it is also printing paper suitable for books. This is not denied by the United States.

The sole question is whether this paper is dutiable under paragraph 396 or under paragraph 401 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897. We insert here the material part of each paragraph.

■ 396. Printing paper, unsized, sized or glued, suitable for books and newspapers, * * *_

401. Writing, letter, note, hand-made, drawing, ledger, bond, record, tablet, and typewriter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morilla Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. United States v. American Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API