United States v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Chief Judge
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, C.D. 2037, sustaining the importer’s protest and holding the instant importations classifiable under paragraph 1503 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as beads, not specially provided for, rather than as articles wholly or in chief value of beads, under the same paragraph.
*136The pertinent provisions of paragraph 1503, as modified by T.D, 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51893, read:
Beads, including bugles, not specially provided for_17%% ad vaL
Fabrics and articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, nor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Morilla Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
3Cited by62 opinions
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Allied Display Materials, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Allied Display Materials, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.