Legal Opinion

United States v. S. H. Kress & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 10, 1959No. 4989PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, C.D. 2037, sustaining the importer’s protest and holding the instant importations classifiable under paragraph 1503 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as beads, not specially provided for, rather than as articles wholly or in chief value of beads, under the same paragraph.

*136The pertinent provisions of paragraph 1503, as modified by T.D, 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51893, read:

Beads, including bugles, not specially provided for_17%% ad vaL

Fabrics and articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Morilla Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Allied Display Materials, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Allied Display Materials, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API