Legal Opinion

Electrolux Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 7, 1958No. C. D. 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as "SteehH. H. utensils” and levying duty thereon at the rate of 20 per *38centum ad valorem under paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739. Plaintiff claims “That said merchandise is properly dutiable at 13%% under Par. 353, Tariff Act of 1930, by virtue of T. D. 52739 amending T. D. 51802, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Morilla Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API