Legal Opinion
Cupo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 21, 1966No. Nos. 19140-19145PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Senior Circuit Judge:
The six appellants were jointly indicted for conspiracy to violate the false pretenses statute of the District of Columbia and five were also charged individually with substantive violations of that statute. 18 U.S.C. § 371; D.C.Code (1961 ed.) § 22-1301. Cupo, Decker, Pelletreau and Sullivan were convicted of conspiracy. The court directed a judgment acquitting Palmer of conspiracy. The jury failed to reach a verdict as to Car-bonaro on the conspiracy count and the court dismissed it as to him on the government’s motion.
The essence of the alleged conspiracy was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- John Michael Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Henry Dewitt Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Charles McGill v. United States of America, Walter M. Hinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.