Legal Opinion

Charles McGill v. United States of America, Walter M. Hinton v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 29, 1965No. 18829_1PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit judge.

Following the return of an indictment against them on April 27, 1964, appellants, McGill and Hinton, together with a third defendant Barnhart, were arraigned in open court on May 1, 1964. They were charged on one count with robbery, and on another count with assault with intent to rob (based on separate complaints). The case came to trial on June 9, 1964. On June 15, 1964, the jury returned its verdict, finding McGill guilty of simple assault and assault with intent to commit robbery and Hinton guilty of robbery and of simple assault. Barnhart was acquitted on all…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Paul Belton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API