Legal Opinion
John Michael Williamson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1962No. 17651_1PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction for violations of 21 U.S.C.A. § 176a. 1 He contends: (1) that the indictment did not allege a violation of law, (2) that the trial court erred in denying his motion for severance, (3) that the court erred in failing to sequester the witnesses, (4) that error occurred in the admission of evidence, and (5) that the closing argument of the prosecutor was improper.
1. Sufficiency of the Indictment. Appellant was named in Counts Three, Four, and Five of a seven-count indictment. Count Three alleged a conspiracy to import marihuana…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.