Legal Opinion
Henry Dewitt Ingram v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1959No. 7937_1PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the appellant is entitled to a new trial because of a misjoinder of defendants in a criminal proceeding. Henry Dewitt Ingram was convicted in two cases of removing, concealing and possessing non-tax-paid liquor. In one case (No. Cr. 166 G-59, which will be referred to as “No. 166”), arising out of events on the evening of March 21, 1959, Ingram was indicted with Clara, his wife, James Gill, Janie Gill and Hozel Duke. In the other case (No. Cr. 497 G-58, which will be referred to as “No. 497”), growing out of events on November 26,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cataneo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- John P. Tillman, Robert Barber Moore, Johnny C. Wilson, Larry Fox, Donald P. Stone and Michael W. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.