Legal Opinion

United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1975No. 74--1138PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Franks and Britton were convicted, after a sixteen-day (16-day) jury trial in district court, of causing others on or about June 2, 1971, to commit physical violence to Jett Hair Care Center (“Jett Hair”) and Tri State Beauty Supply (“Tri-State”), two Memphis, Tennessee, businesses whose operation affected commerce, in furtherance of a plan and purpose to obstruct commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) (1970), 1 and of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1970). 2 Franks and Britton also were convicted of aiding and abetting the malicious…

2Cases cited105 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United States v. ElderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API