Legal Opinion

People v. Zimmermann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1996No. 96SA17PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings of a hearing board, but modified the board’s recommendation that the respondent be suspended for six months to a recommendation of suspension for one year and one day. Both the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have excepted to the panel’s recommendation. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation and order that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day.

I

The' respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1971. The respondent stipulated to and admitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. RaderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. GalindoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People v. SimsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re ClelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. SmallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. FagerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API