Legal Opinion

People v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 10, 1995No. 95SA259PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding was admitted to the practice of law in Colorado in 1967. The assistant disci-phnary counsel and he entered into a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three years. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation. The parties stipulated to the following facts and disciphnary violations which are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. People v. GalindoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. LeflySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In Re ClelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. ForemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API