Legal Opinion

People v. Fager

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1996No. 96SA249PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves lawyer discipline. The respondent defaulted before the supreme court grievance committee and has not appeared in this court. A hearing panel generally approved the findings and recommendations of a hearing board that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day and pay certain restitution. The panel modified the recommendation in one respect by requiring the respondent to explain what he did with those client funds described in the -findings and which have not been accounted for. We accept the panel’s recommendations.

I

The respondent was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. FagerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. WeisbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. People v. BeasleySupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API