Legal Opinion

People v. Rader

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 1992No. 91SA391PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline proceeding, a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for three months for conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Neither the assistant disciplinary counsel nor the respondent has excepted to this recommendation. We accept the recommendation, and order that the respondent be suspended for three months and be assessed the costs of the proceeding.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on May 17, 1977, is registered as an attorney upon this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. B & B Asphalt Co. v. T. S. McShane Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. United States v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Ebrahimi v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Ackerman v. SchwartzDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. HolscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re: Robert B. SurrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. In re HainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. In Re FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney ASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API