Legal Opinion

Bartsch v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1996No. WD 52370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Chief Judge, Presiding Judge.

Southwest Veterinary Diagnostics (“Southwest”) appeals from the final decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal finding that Kim Moore (“claimant”) was not disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits subsequent to her termination by Southwest. The issue presented is whether claimant was discharged for conduct sufficiently egregious to constitute misconduct to permit disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits.

The scope of appellate review in unemployment compensation cases is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Garden View Care Center, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Business Centers of Missouri, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Francis Howell School District v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Massey v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Kansas City Station Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Yellow Freight System v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. PharmFlex, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Streitz v. JuneauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Koret of California, Inc. v. ZimmermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API