Legal Opinion

Streitz v. Juneau

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1997No. 21127PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Claimant sought unemployment benefits under the Missouri Employment Security Law, Chapter 288, RSMo 1994. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, adopting “the decision of the Appeals Tribunal as a decision of the Commission” denied the claim. A Deputy of the Missouri Division of Employment Security had initially determined that Claimant was entitled to benefits. The Deputy found that Claimant quit because he was reprimanded in an abusive manner, concluding, “Claimant has a right to expect that reprimands be given in a civil manner.”

The Appeals Tribunal of the Division…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Belle State Bank v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hessler v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Heavy Duty Trux Ltd. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Mitchell v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Charles v. Missouri Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Flik International Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Partee v. Winco Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Davis v. School of the Ozarks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Lost in the Fifties, LLC v. MeeceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Knobbe v. Artco Casket Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API