People v. Lain
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Appellant was convicted on two counts, count one being assault with a deadly weapon, and count two being robbery in the first degree. This appeal is from the judgment and also from the order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Appellant urges numerous grounds for a reversal of the judgment. In order that our discussion of the various points raised may be better understood, we will give a fairly complete summary of the facts, as shown by the record.
The appellant was a tavern owner in the city of Woodland. On April 2, 1941, one James Bailey, the complaining witness…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. RosenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. TribbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Serra v. Salesian SocietySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Holland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.