Legal Opinion

People v. Lain

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1943No. Crim. 1807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Appellant was convicted on two counts, count one being assault with a deadly weapon, and count two being robbery in the first degree. This appeal is from the judgment and also from the order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Appellant urges numerous grounds for a reversal of the judgment. In order that our discussion of the various points raised may be better understood, we will give a fairly complete summary of the facts, as shown by the record.

The appellant was a tavern owner in the city of Woodland. On April 2, 1941, one James Bailey, the complaining witness…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. RosenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. TribbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Serra v. Salesian SocietySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. Holland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API