People v. Tribble
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.(1) The principal issue considered in this opinion is when the specific intent to rob must be formed in relation to the seizing of the victim in order to constitute a violation of Penal Code section 209 (kidnaping for the purpose of robbery) in those offenses which took place after the 1951 amendment to said code section. We have concluded that the intention to commit robbery must be present at the time of the original asportation.
A jury found defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree (Pen. Code, §§211, 211a), kidnaping to commit robbery with bodily harm (Pen. Code,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. MilanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.