Legal Opinion

Walters Nat. Bank v. Bantock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1913No. 3320PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Comanche County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by H. Bantoek against the Walters National Bank, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The defendant in error, Bantock, as plaintiff below, sued the Walters National Bank for the sum of $1,000, and upon a trial before a jury was given a verdict for the sum claimed. The defendant bank has appealed on case-made to this court.

Bantoek employed the W. E. Wilson Realty Company, a copartnership, composed of W. E. Wilson and W. W. Graves, to sell á farm belonging to his mother-in-law. The realty company found a purchaser who lived in Nebraska, who agreed to take the farm for $5,450, and sent to the realty company a draft for the sum of $1,000 to be applied to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Leary v. Citizens & Manufacturers National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Barach v. Island Empire Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Southwest National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API