Legal Opinion

Honnold v. Brd. of Com'rs Carter Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1916No. 5224PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County ; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by O. Edgar Honnold against Bo'ard of County Commissioners of Carter County, Okla., and Wim. Kirkpatrick and others, members of such board. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

Carter county, Okla., being legally .and justly indebted upon valid and subsisting warrants and claims in the sum of $46,000, said claims and ac-. counts were duly prosecuted to judgment on the 3d day of September, A. D. 1912, in the district court of said county, by the Ard-more National Bank, for itself and as representative of other holders of said claims. Said judgment being in the sum of $46,000, and said proceedings having been had under chapter 7, art. 3, entitled “Municipal Bund-ing Bonds,” af the Revised Laws of Oklahoma 1910. The plaintiff in error made the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Anthony v. County of JasperSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Beach v. LeahySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Smith Engineering Works v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Comanche CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API