Fiegel v. First Nat. Bank of Kingfisher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action by First -National Bank of Kingfisher against W. M. Hamil to recover upon promissory notes. Order of attachment issued and levied upon a growing wheat crop. Victor Fiegel, intervener. Judgment for plaintiff for amount sued for- and- attachment sustained. Defendant and intervener bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
Victor J. Fiegel and W. M. Hamil prosecute this appeal to reverse this judgment in favor of the First -National Bank of Kingfisher entered on the 12th day of June, 1918, in an action instituted on the 4th. day of February, 191.8 by the First National Bank against W. M. Hamil to recover upon certain promissory notes executed by Hamil to the bank
The material facts necessary to be considered in determining the questions presented by this appeal, briefly stated, in substance, are as follows: On February 14, 1918, the date on which the bank instituted the action against Hamil, it caused a writ of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Frey v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Leonard v. BeaudryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Fenby v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. SittingdownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Temple v. Cotton Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.