Leonard v. Beaudry
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit for breach of sawing contract. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for a breach of contract. The declaration alleged, by way of inducement, that plaintiff was the owner of a steam saw-mill in the township of Laketown, which was fitted with a band-saw and all the appliances necessary for its proper operation, well equipped, in good working condition, and capable of cutting 30,000 feet of pine lumber per day.
The plaintiff then alleges that on the first day of March, 1886, the plaintiff made and entered into a contract with defendants, whereby they agreed to furnish and deliver at her mill in the spring of 1886, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Atkinson v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Goodrich v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Petrie v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by23 opinions
- Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Hichhorn, Mack & Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Watson v. Kirby & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Industrial Works v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- John Hutchinson Manufacturing Co. v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.