Legal Opinion

Temple v. Cotton Transfer Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1934No. 28801PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action at law for damages alleged to have resulted to plaintiff by reason of personal injuries received while “lawfully riding as a passenger and guest in an automobile, the property of one E. Byron Hirst,” which was by Hirst operated and driven at the time of the accident. Plaintiff alleged that the accident from which his injuries resulted was due wholly to the unlawful and negligent parking by the defendant Cotton Transfer Company and its drivers of two trucks upon, the traveled portion of the highway; that due to the situation of the trucks a collision followed in which…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Treadway v. S. C. & St. P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Brashear v. RabensteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Wilkey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Campbell v. OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Twenty Club v. State, Department of Roads & IrrigationNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Akins v. ChamberlainNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API