Legal Opinion

Frey v. Michie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Application for man.damus to seat an appointee of the board of supervisors of Wayne county as a county superintendent of the poor. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This Court, upon the application of relator, gave him an order on respondents to show cause • why they do not admit him to sit with them as their colleague -on the board of county superintendents of the poor of Wayne county. Notice was ordered to be served on the parties interested, and notice was actually served on the board of county auditors of Wayne county, and upon Patrick Blake, the appointee of the board of auditors to the place claimed by relator. All of these parties answered and showed cause. The question now arises whether a mandamus should issue as prayed. This requires a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Speed v. HartwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Jhons v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. People ex rel. White v. DoesburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Babcock v. HanselmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Curran v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Rich v. JochimMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fuller v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Maynard v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Vrooman v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API