Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1938No. Civ. 11857PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of respondents after the trial court sustained a demurrer .without leave to amend to a petition for a writ of mandate requiring the Board of County Peace Officers Retirement Commission of the County of Los Angeles to make an order allowing petitioner a retirement allowance petitioner appeals.

The material facts alleged in the petition for a writ of mandate are:

August 14, 1930, petitioner, a Los Angeles County motorcycle' officer, received injuries while engaged in the performance of his duty, which totally and permanently disabled him. Thereafter he was awarded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Kavanagh v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Atchley v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Talbott v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API