Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts ate stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in a proceeding wherein he sought and obtained a writ of mandate requiring the defendants, as the board of police commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, to restore said plaintiff to the position of a police officer of and in the police department of the said municipality, and also to restore the plaintiff to the pension-roll of the police and pension fund of said department, and to pay to said plaintiff his accrued pensions as a retired police officer, amounting to ■ the sum of, four thousand six hundred dollars.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kavanagh v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- French v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Geimann v. Board of Police Commr's.California Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Talbott v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.